Floral development, fruit set, and dispersal of the Gulf of St. Lawrence Aster (<i>Symphyotrichum laurentianum</i>) (Fernald) Nesom
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Gulf of St. Lawrence aster, Symphyotrichum laurentianum (Fernald) Nesom is listed as “threatened” according to the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC). This rare halophyte is found in only a few locations in New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, and the Magdalen Islands in Quebec. Developmental evidence confirms that there are two types of florets within each flower head and that each floral type has a biseriate pappus. The centrally located “disk” florets are distinctly larger than the more numerous peripheral “pistillate” florets throughout their development. The disk florets are bisexual and consist of an ovule, a style with a bifid stigma, and four to five stamens. The peripheral florets are pistillate and consist of an ovule and a style with a bifid stigma but no stamens. The main goals of this study were to assess fruit set in both types of florets, and the wind dispersal potential of their fruit (achenes). Pistillate flowers had a lower percentage of embryo-containing (filled) achenes (15.1%) than hermaphroditic florets (27.8%) in plants grown ex situ. The majority (68.3%) of filled achenes were produced by pistillate florets. Heads grown in situ had 64.9% filled achenes. Although the achenes of this plant have structures to aid dispersal by wind, in situ observations and experimental data show that this method of dispersal may be affected by the influence of the surrounding vegetation and flooding events. The impact of other factors that may affect the reproductive biology of this rare plant are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".