MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2023440276 · doi:10.1117/12.382257

<title>Assessment of temporal jitter in ECG gated dynamic three-dimensional echocardiography</title>

2000· article· en· W2023440276 on OpenAlexaff
Seemantini K. Nadkarni, Derek R. Boughner, Aaron Fenster

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersMedical Research Council
KeywordsJitterCardiac cycleCardiac imagingImaging phantomComputer visionComputer scienceTemporal resolutionArtificial intelligenceImage qualityPhysicsOpticsCardiologyImage (mathematics)MedicineTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic-3D echocardiography can potentially provide an accurate representation of the complex cardiac anatomy and dynamics over the cardiac cycle. However, the image quality of dynamic-3D echocardiography is limited by temporal jitter artifacts; which result from the asynchronous acquisition of video frames with respect to the cardiac cycle. In our study, we estimate the extent of temporal jitter in dynamic-3D echocardiography using in-vitro studies, and also provide a theoretical method to predict temporal jitter. Dynamic-3D images of a myocardial motion phantom were reconstructed and analyzed for cardiac wall motion at different heart rates. Our algorithm to quantify temporal jitter consisted of three steps. First, the distance of a reference plane to the surface of the phantom was computed and plotted as a 2D grayscale distance map in each 3D image. Second, surface variation maps were derived and finally, 2D jitter maps were plotted to provide a measure of temporal jitter in each 3D image at each cardiac phase. Temporal jitter was as large as 3.5 mm in peak systole and 1.5 mm in end diastole. The standard deviation in the jitter maps ranged from 0.5 mm in end-diastole to 1.0 mm in peak-systole; which agreed well with our theoretical analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE→Same topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→