Effect of ion-beam bombardment on microstructural and magnetic properties of Ni<sub>80</sub>Fe<sub>20</sub>/α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>thin films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ion-beam bombardment has been established as an effective way to tune the microstructure and thus modify the magnetic anisotropy of thin film materials, leading to certain remarkable magnetic properties. In this work, we investigated a Ni80Fe20/α-Fe2O3 bilayer deposited with a dual ion-beam deposition technique. Low-energy argon ion-beam bombardment during the α-Fe2O3 deposition led to a decline of crystallinity and interfacial roughness of the bilayer, whereas the grain size distribution remained essentially unchanged. At low temperature, the coercivity exhibited a pronounced decrease after the bombardment, indicating that the effective uniaxial anisotropy in the ferromagnetic layer was dramatically reduced. Such reduction in uniaxial anisotropy was likely attributed to the irreversible transition in the α-Fe2O3 grains caused by the ion-beam bombardment, which subsequently modified the anisotropy in the Ni80Fe20 layer. The bombarded bilayer also exhibited a larger ΔMFC–ZFC compared to the un-bombarded bilayer, which indicated a stronger exchange coupling between the ferromagnetic layer and the antiferromagnetic layer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".