On the use of EMD for automatic newborn cry segmentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cry segmentation is an essential preprocessing step in any infant crying diagnosis system. Besides crying sounds consisting of expiration phases followed by short periods of inspiration episodes, each recording of newborn cries also includes silence sections as well as other sounds such as speech of caregivers, noise and sound of medical equipments. This paper is devoted to a newly developed Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) application to cry segmentation. The goal of the segmentation is to detect cry episodes automatically from unimportant acoustic activities existed inside the recorded signals. EMD decomposes a multicomponent non stationary signal into a set of monocomponent signals called Intrinsic Mode Functions (IMFs). The cry signals are segmented using Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) applied to the features extracted by employing EMD combined with Mel-Frequency Cepstral coefficients to the recorded cry signals. The performance of the proposed approach is evaluated on a database of 200 cry signals recorded in a real clinical environment. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness and suitability of the proposed method for the automatic cry segmentation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".