Multiple Pathways Involved in Porcine Parvovirus Cellular Entry and Trafficking toward the Nucleus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Porcine parvovirus (PPV) is a major cause of reproductive failure in swine. The mechanisms implicated in the first steps of infection that lead to the delivery of the PPV genome to the nucleus are poorly understood. In the present work, a panel of chemical inhibitors was used to dissect the cellular mechanisms involved in establishing a PPV infection. The results demonstrated that following binding to sialic acids on cell surface glycoproteins, the virus used both clathrin-mediated endocytosis and macropinocytosis pathways to gain access into cells. Virus obtained from infected cells was present either as isolated particles or as aggregates, and these two forms could be separated by low-speed centrifugation. Isolated and purified particles strongly preferred entry by clathrin-mediated endocytosis, whereas aggregates clearly favored macropinocytosis. Subsequent endosomal acidification and traffic to the late endosomes were also shown to be essential for infection. The microtubule network was found to be important during the first 10 h of infection, whereas an intact actin network was required for almost the whole viral cycle. Proteasome processing was found to be essential, and capsid proteins were ubiquitinated relatively early during infection. Taken together, these results provided new insights into the first steps of PPV infection, including the use of alternative entry pathways, unique among members of this viral family.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".