MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023606012 · doi:10.2118/120257-pa

Pilot-Scale Engineered Wetland Design for Produced Water Treatment

2009· article· en· W2023606012 on OpenAlexaff
Brian M. Davis, Scott Wallace, Roberta Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Projects Facilities & Construction · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicConstructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
Canadian institutionsStantec (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBTEXProduced waterBiochemical oxygen demandEffluentBiodegradationEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineeringConstructed wetlandAerationWetlandHydraulic retention timeTotal dissolved solidsChemical oxygen demandEthylbenzeneWaste managementSewage treatmentChemistryBenzeneEngineeringEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Engineered wetlands are a promising technology for treatment of oilfield and gasfield produced water. The engineering optimization of natural treatment processes, adapted from chemical engineering reactor design principles, shows that engineered wetlands are a viable alternative to mechanical produced water treatment systems. Engineered wetlands incorporate a subsurface flow gravel bed reactor, lined with an impermeable liner and equipped with an aeration system to enhance oxygen delivery. Design parameters include biodegradation rate coefficients for biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and individual organic compounds, produced water flowrate, temperature, and influent and required effluent concentrations. An oil and gas company in the Caspian region is seeking to use engineered wetlands for treatment of oilfield and gasfield produced water. The oilfield produced water concentrations are high in total dissolved solids (TDS: 43048 mg/L), BOD (14693 mg/L), and oil and grease (1213 mg/L) and moderately high in total benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX; 3.067 mg/L). The gasfield produced water concentrations are moderately high in TDS (16110 mg/L), BOD (9910 mg/L), and oil and grease (557 mg/L) and high in total BTEX (12.393 mg/L). Pilot-scale engineered wetland treatment systems have been designed on a flowrate basis of 100 m3/d using the first-order kinetic mass reaction model recently published by Kadlec and Wallace (2009). This model uses a modified tanks-in-series number that accounts for both hydraulic effects and weathering effects in the biodegradation rate. Hydraulic effects are caused by dispersion in the saturated gravel bed. Variation in the biodegradation rate is because of rapid biodegradation at the upgradient portion of the engineered wetland, in which short chain/low molecular weight organics are oxidized at rapid rates, and slower biodegradation at the downgradient portion of the engineered wetland, in which long chain/higher molecular weight organics are oxidized at lower rates. This advanced design process, combined with BOD surface area loading criteria, enables the optimization of engineered wetland design for produced water treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Projects Facilities & ConstructionSame topicConstructed Wetlands for Wastewater TreatmentFrench-language works237,207