Correlation Between Cortical θ Activity and Hippocampal Volumes in Health, Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Mild Dementia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cognitive decline is known to be associated with both increased theta power over frontal regions and hippocampal atrophy. The aim of this study was to reveal the relation between these parameters in groups with mild dementia, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy control subjects. The authors examined a preliminary randomly selected sample of 39 right-handed subjects joining the Leipzig Longitudinal Study of the Aged, consisting of 17 normal elderly subjects, 12 patients with mild cognitive impairment, and 10 patients with mild dementia assessed by Clinical Dementia Rating. All subjects were between 75 and 85 years old (mean age, 78 years; standard deviation, 2.78 years) and underwent EEG and brain MRI. Mean spectral power densities were calculated, and hippocampal body volume was measured. Significant negative linear correlations between theta power over frontal regions and hippocampal volumes were found. The results support the assumption about a relationship between hippocampal atrophy and theta power, and may be helpful for a better understanding of the course of Alzheimer's disease.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".