Relationship Perfectionism, Dysphoria, and Hostile Interpersonal Behaviors
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Problematic interpersonal behaviors and their consequences for relationships with others have been implicated in the maintenance and onset of depression. The mechanism leading to aversive social behaviors was examined in this study using a sample of dysphoric and nondysphoric undergraduate female students. Specifically, we examined two questions: (a) Is relationship perfectionism associated with depression?; and (b) Does relationship perfectionism mediate the relation between depression and aversive interpersonal behaviors? Using a self-report measure of relationship perfectionism, results revealed that perfectionistic expectations and standards for relationships were higher for the dysphoric than the nondysphoric, never-depressed women. Moreover, perfectionistic relationship expectations for others, in particular, partially explained the relation between dysphoria and hostile interpersonal behaviors. These findings are discussed in terms of past studies of perfectionism and depression and in terms of current conceptualizations of perfectionism and depressive social behaviors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it