Effects of Bythotrephes on the trophic position of native macroinvertebrates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We measured the δ15N and δ13C stable isotopes of pelagic invertebrate predators in six central Ontario lakes, three invaded by Bythotrephes and three not invaded, to determine the effects of Bythotrephes invasion on diet overlap and trophic position of the predators. Seasonally averaged, lake-specific isotope signatures of bulk zooplankton were used as the isotopic baseline for determining nitrogen-based trophic position or carbon enrichment of the predators. Trophic positions of native Chaoborus , Leptodora , and Mysis in invaded lakes were not elevated compared with noninvaded lakes, suggesting that these predators do not feed directly on Bythotrephes. Nitrogen signatures of Mysis and Chaoborus were similar as were those of Leptodora and Bythotrephes, suggesting that invasion impacts will be greatest on Leptodora as has been observed. The trophic position of large Mysis was generally the highest and most variable of all predators, probably because it feeds on copepods that are more enriched in the heavier nitrogen isotope than bulk zooplankton and because Bythotrephes tends to decrease the ratio of cladocerans to copepods in invaded zooplankton communities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".