Heat transport characteristics of flexible looped heat pipe under micro‐gravity condition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This paper presents the heat transport performance of a flexible looped heat pipe (FLHP) with the working fluid of ammonium under micro‐gravity condition. The evaporator of the FLHP has two coaxial wicks. The outer wick is made of PTFE with 1.2µm pore diameter and the inner one is made of polyethylene with 12µm pore diameter. The inside surface of the inner wick is axially grooved. The core of the inner wick is used as liquid reservoir so that reliability of the operation can be enhanced. The experiment revealed that the FLHP performed normally under micro‐gravity condition and had the predicted capillary limit. The FLHP showed good temperature control ability and was like a VCHP in the range of 150 to 240 W heat transfer rate. Liquid behavior observed in the visual module ensured the normal operation of the second wick and inner axial grooves under micro‐gravity condition. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Heat Trans Asian Res, 32(5): 381–390, 2003; Published online in Wiley InterScience ( www.interscience.wiley.com ). DOI 10.1002/htj.10092
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".