MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023779012 · doi:10.1002/htj.10092

Heat transport characteristics of flexible looped heat pipe under micro‐gravity condition

2003· article· en· W2023779012 on OpenAlexafffund
Tetsurou Ogushi, Akira Yao, Jason J. Xu, Hiromitsu Masumoto, Masahiro Kawaji

Bibliographic record

VenueHeat Transfer-Asian Research · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Boiling Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersCanadian Space AgencyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsHeat pipeEvaporatorHeat transferCapillary actionMaterials scienceAxial symmetryMechanicsLoop heat pipeHeat fluxCoaxialMicro-loop heat pipeMechanical engineeringComposite materialHeat exchangerEngineeringPhysicsStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper presents the heat transport performance of a flexible looped heat pipe (FLHP) with the working fluid of ammonium under micro‐gravity condition. The evaporator of the FLHP has two coaxial wicks. The outer wick is made of PTFE with 1.2µm pore diameter and the inner one is made of polyethylene with 12µm pore diameter. The inside surface of the inner wick is axially grooved. The core of the inner wick is used as liquid reservoir so that reliability of the operation can be enhanced. The experiment revealed that the FLHP performed normally under micro‐gravity condition and had the predicted capillary limit. The FLHP showed good temperature control ability and was like a VCHP in the range of 150 to 240 W heat transfer rate. Liquid behavior observed in the visual module ensured the normal operation of the second wick and inner axial grooves under micro‐gravity condition. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Heat Trans Asian Res, 32(5): 381–390, 2003; Published online in Wiley InterScience ( www.interscience.wiley.com ). DOI 10.1002/htj.10092

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeat Transfer-Asian ResearchSame topicHeat Transfer and Boiling StudiesFrench-language works237,207