MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023790194 · doi:10.1007/s11746-011-1902-0

Effect of Temperature and Time on the Stability of Salmon Skin Oil During Storage

2011· article· en· W2023790194 on OpenAlexafffund
Alberta N. A. Aryee, Benjamin K. Simpson, Leroy E. Phillip, R.I. Cue

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Oil Chemists Society · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicEdible Oils Quality and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTBARSThiobarbituric acidPeroxide valueChemistryMalondialdehydePeroxideFatty acidFish oilAcid valueFood scienceFish <Actinopterygii>Lipid peroxidationBiochemistryFisheryAntioxidantBiologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The effect of 45 days of storage at 25, 4, −18 and −80 °C on the quality indices; free fatty acid (FFA) content, peroxide value (PV), thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), and changes in the fatty acid (FA) profile of crude oil recovered from salmon fish skins were evaluated at 5 day intervals using spectrophotometric and titrimetric methods. Higher temperatures and longer storage time resulted in higher quantities of oxidative products in the salmon skin oil (SSO). By day 45, SSO stored at 25 and 4 °C had 8.50 and 8.29% FFA, 32.43 and 26.33 μg malondialdehyde (MDA) eq g −1 oil, and 88.19 and 64.53 mequiv peroxide kg −1 oil, respectively. No significant ( p > 0.05) changes in fatty acid profile were observed at all the storage temperature and time studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Oil Chemists SocietySame topicEdible Oils Quality and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207