Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the effect of unevenly prestressed carbon-fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) sheets used for strengthening a prestressed concrete beam (L = 3·6 m). An integrated anchor system, consisting of steel brackets and anchor plates, is used to prestress the sheets. To predict the behaviour of the CFRP sheet during a prestressing operation, a three-dimensional finite-element analysis model is built. The model includes the reinforced concrete element, structural solid element and elastic shell element to represent the concrete, anchorage and CFRP sheet respectively. The model shows good agreement with test data, including a maximum error of less than 5%. Stress concentrations in the CFRP sheet are predicted near the tip of the anchor plates. Uneven prestressing effects are observed across the CFRP sheet because of the anchor geometry and uneven bonding of the sheet in the laboratory. These effects cause uneven rupture of the sheet when the strengthened beam is flexurally loaded to failure. To avoid such a failure mode, care should be exercised when the strengthening system is prepared with adequate anchorage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".