Dose Response and Pharmacokinetics of Tofacitinib (CP‐690,550), an Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitor, in the Treatment of Chronic Plaque Psoriasis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Longitudinal nonlinear mixed effects modeling was used to characterize the dose–response profile of tofacitinib using data from a placebo‐controlled dose‐ranging study, where tofacitinib 2, 5, and 15 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) were evaluated for plaque psoriasis treatment. Bayesian estimation was applied with prior information derived from the literature: nonclinical and clinical data in psoriasis, as well as other indications. The probability to achieve a certain target effect associated with a given dose was calculated from the posterior samples. On the basis of these probabilities along with safety considerations, tofacitinib 5 and 10 mg b.i.d. were selected for further testing in confirmatory phase III clinical trials. Pharmacokinetics in patients with psoriasis was characterized using a population‐based modeling approach, and body weight was identified as an important covariate. A subgroup analysis suggested reduced efficacy of tofacitinib with increasing body weight; however, it is unclear whether this trend could be explained by systemic exposure alone. CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology (2013) 2, e44; doi: 10.1038/psp.2013.22 ; advance online publication 22 May 2013
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".