MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023860819 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2014-0358

Structure and reactivity of phosphate diesters. Dependence on the nonleaving group

2015· article· en· W2023860819 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anthony J. Kirby, Bruno S. Souza, Faruk Nome

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicChemical Reaction Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryReactivity (psychology)HydrolysisGroup (periodic table)Leaving groupPhosphateMoleculeStereochemistryComputational chemistryMedicinal chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The hydrolytic reactivity of simple phosphate diesters with very good leaving groups is known to be practically independent of the nonleaving group at 100 °C. Calculations on the (too slow to measure) hydrolysis at 25 °C of a series of p-nitrophenyl diesters ROPO2––OpNP with a wide range of nonleaving group OR indicate a small but significant effect at the lower temperature, making the R = methyl ester the most reactive. This is in the opposite sense to the much larger effect observed for the reactions of triesters and consistent with a reaction driven primarily by leaving group departure. The calculations use a continuum model with up to four discrete water molecules: two or three waters give the best results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicChemical Reaction MechanismsFrench-language works237,207