A criterion-based multilayer access control approach for multimedia applications and the implementation considerations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, a novel criterion-based multilayer access control (CBMAC) approach is presented to enhance existing access control models such as Role-Based, Mandatory, and Discretionary Access Control models to support multilayer (multilevel) access control. The proposed approach is based on a set of predefined security criteria which are extracted from authorization rules. The security attributes of objects and users are specified by security criterion expressions (serving as locks) and the elements (serving as keys) of security criterion subsets respectively. An object embedded with a number of security criterion expressions becomes a secure object while a user associated with a security criterion subset is called a secure user. The multilayer access control is achieved by evaluating the embedded security criterion expressions (actuating locks) by the elements (keys) in a user's security criterion subset. The paper also provides the details of integrating the proposed approach with existing access control models and presents the implementation considerations of Criterion-Based Role-Based Multilayer Access Control, the integration of CBMAC and Role-Based Access Control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".