MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023924786 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.45.2.307

NUMANOITE, Ca4CuB4O6(OH)6(CO3)2, A NEW MINERAL SPECIES, THE Cu ANALOGUE OF BORCARITE FROM THE FUKA MINE, OKAYAMA PREFECTURE, JAPAN

2007· article· en· W2023924786 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMineralGeologyGeochemistryMining engineeringMineralogyMetallurgyMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numanoite, the Cu analogue of borcarite, is found in an irregular patch in crystalline limestone near gehlenite–spurrite skarns at the Fuka mine, Okayama Prefecture, Japan. Numanoite (up to 1 mm across) is observed as a core or zones in borcarite crystals up to 5 mm long. The mineral is also found as veinlets up to 0.4 mm wide in aggregates of borcarite crystals. The associated minerals are nifontovite, bultfonteinite, calcite and an unidentified magnesium silicate mineral. In hand specimen, the mineral is blue-green to colorless and transparent with a vitreous luster. The streak is white to pale blue-green. Numanoite is monoclinic, space group C 2/ m , a 17.794(2), b 8.381(1), c 4.4494(7) A, β 102.42(2)° and Z = 2. The strongest seven lines in the X-ray powder-diffraction pattern [ d in A( I )( hkl )] are 7.57(100)(110), 2.671(84)(421), 2.727(68)(221), 1.887(52)(041,440), 2.272(48)(331), 2.899(44)(600) and 1.698(34)(640). Electron-microprobe and thermogravimetric analyses gave B 2 O 3 24.09, CaO 38.11, CuO 10.32, MgO 1.02, ZnO 0.51, CO 2 15.80, H 2 O 9.75, sum 99.60 wt.%. The empirical formula, calculated on the basis of O = 18, is Ca 3.898 (Cu 0.744 Mg 0.145 Zn 0.036 ) ∑0.925 B 3.969 O 5.615 (OH) 6.208 (CO 3 ) 2.059 , ideally Ca 4 CuB 4 O 6 (OH) 6 (CO 3 ) 2 . The mineral is optically biaxial negative, α 1.618(2), β 1.658(2), γ 1.672(2), and 2 V calc = 60°. The mineral has perfect cleavages in two directions. The density is 2.96(2) g/cm 3 (meas.) and 2.93 g/cm 3 (calc.). The Vickers microhardness is 376 (290–464) kg/mm 2 (25 g load), and the Mohs hardness number is 4½. The differential thermal analysis curve shows two endothermic peaks at 489° and 692°C. It is likely that numanoite from the Fuka mine formed by precipitation from late Cu- and Mg-bearing hydrothermal solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it