59 * NATIONAL AUDIT OF DEMENTIA: PROGRESS REPORT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Evidence-base: At any one time, a quarter of acute hospital beds are in use by people with dementia. Concerns have repeatedly been expressed about the quality of inpatient care that people with dementia receive. It is recommended that frail older people admitted to general hospitals receive a comprehensive assessment which focuses on their medical and psychological conditions and functional capacity as part of a holistic treatment approach. Change strategies: The National Audit of Dementia was established in 2008 to examine the quality of care received by people with dementia in general hospitals in England and Wales. Two rounds of audit took place in 2010 and 2012. Each collected data from 210 hospitals in England and Wales, (99% of Trusts and Health Boards in 2010 and 100% in 2012). Each hospital was required to audit 40 case notes of patients with a diagnosis or current history of dementia. Information on physical and mental health assessments recorded was collected. Hospitals were asked if they had a care pathway for dementia. Change Effects: Conclusion: Results overall show improvements in physical health assessments, with room to improve further, particularly in assessment of functioning. Mental health assessment also requires improvement. Fully comprehensive assessment is not yet in place for the majority of people with dementia, and hospital care pathways are yet to be fully implemented in most hospitals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".