MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2023948505 · doi:10.4043/23934-ms

Liwan Gas Project: First South China Sea Deepwater Completions Campaign

2013· article· en· W2023948505 on OpenAlexaff
John Charles Jennings, David Kenneth Triolo, Tracy Mosness, J. Rezende

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geophysical Studies
Canadian institutionsHusky Energy (Canada)
FundersChina National Offshore Oil Corporation
KeywordsGeologyDrillingSubmarine pipelineStructural basinChinaDrillNatural gas fieldPetroleum engineeringHydrology (agriculture)Mining engineeringNatural gasGeomorphologyGeotechnical engineeringArchaeologyEngineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Husky Energy installed 14 " frac-pack?? lower completions, 10 sub-sea horizontal trees, and 7 upper completions utilizing two 6-th generation deep water semi-submersibles in Block 29/26 of the Pearl River Marine Basin (PRMB) South China Sea between June 2011 and January 2013. On average, the lower completions, tree installation and upper completions required, 12 days, 2 day and 24 days, respectively. The water depth ranged from 650 m to 1450 m. Introduction In 2004 Husky Energy signed a production sharing contract with the China National Offshore Oil Company (CNOOC) for Pearl River Basin South China Sea deep water Block 29/26 which is 320 km south of Hong Kong (see Figure No. 1). In April 2006, the exploration well Liwan 3-1-1 was drilled in 1500 meters of water discovering the Liwan 3–1 gas reservoir. A 6th generation semi-submersible being built in South Korea was contracted for 3 years (plus 2 × 1-year options). Drilling re-commenced in November 2008 and by November 2011, 26 wells were drilled consisting of 10 exploration wells, 10 appraisal wells and 6 development wells. Six wells were drill stem tested. Three fields with gas-bearing sandstone reservoirs were discovered; Liwan 3–1, Liuhua 34–2, and Luihua 29–1 (See Figure No. 2) Regional Geology The Liwan 3–1 field is located in 1300 to 1500 m water depth within the Baiyun Sag of the Zhu 2 Sub-basin. The two nearest fields are the Panyu 30–1 gas field and the Liuhia 11–1 oil field located 64 km north-west and 102 km northeast, respectively. The PRMB lies on the northern continental shelf of the South China Sea. The Liwan structure developed during the early Miocene. The organic-rich sediments on the Wenchang formation, middle to upper Eocene, are considered to be the potential source rock for the reservoir. The tectonic events during the Oligocene-Miocene period which affected regional sea levels led to significant changes in the drainage framework of the Pearl River, provenance of sediments and depositional environments. Following these tectonic events, thermo-subsidence occurred in the Baiyun Sag and the depositional environment changed from a continental shelf with neritic deposition to a continental slope with deep-water deposition. The main hydrocarbon bearing reservoir, Zhujiang formation, in the Liwan 3–1 Gas field is a turbidite basin-floor fan. The lithology is predominantly claystone and siltstone with local thin deep-water sand stone units. During the Nanhai movement in Late Oligocene most parts of the PRMB were uplifted and partially eroded to form a wide regional unconformity surface. As a result of subsequent sea level rise most portions of the Baiyun sag exhibited shallow marine sedimentation. During subsequent regression, delta profradation occurred primarily in the south Uplift Belt in the southern part of the Baiyun Sag. The Zhuhai Formation, found beneath the Zhujiang formation, is characterized by excellent reservoir quality, deltaic-shallow marine sandstones.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOffshore Technology ConferenceSame topicGeological and Geophysical StudiesFrench-language works237,207