Eugenol-induced contractions of saponin-skinned fibers are inhibited by heparin or by a ryanodine receptor blocker
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of eugenol on the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) and contractile apparatus of chemically skinned skeletal muscle fibers of the frog Rana catesbeiana were investigated. In saponin-skinned fibers, eugenol (5 mmol/L) induced muscle contractions, probably by releasing Ca(2+) from the SR. The Ca(2+)-induced Ca(2+) release blocker ruthenium red (10 micromol/L) inhibited both caffeine- and eugenol-induced muscle contractions. Ryanodine (200 micromol/L), a specific ryanodine receptor/Ca(2+) release channel blocker, promoted complete inhibition of the contractions induced by caffeine, but only partially blocked the contractions induced by eugenol. Heparin (2.5 mg/mL), an inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (InsP3) receptor blocker, strongly inhibited the contractions induced by eugenol but had only a small effect on the caffeine-induced contractions. Eugenol neither altered the Ca(2+) sensitivity nor the maximal force in Triton X-100 skinned muscle fibers. These data suggest that muscle contraction induced by eugenol involves at least 2 mechanisms of Ca(2+) release from the SR: one related to the activation of the ryanodine receptors and another through a heparin-sensitive pathway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".