Results of laser in situ keratomileusis performed using solid-state laser technology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate and report the visual, refractive, and aberrometry outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct low to moderate myopia using a commercial solid-state laser. SETTING: Oftalmar, Medimar International Hospital, Alicante, Spain. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: This study evaluated consecutive eyes with low to moderate myopia that had LASIK performed using a Pulzar Z1 solid-state laser. Visual, refractive, and aberrometry changes as well as potential complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The study enrolled 60 eyes (34 patients). The mean follow-up was 8.5 months (range 6 to 13 months). There was a significant improvement in logMAR uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) postoperatively (P<.01). No significant change was detected in logMAR corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (P=.21). The postoperative logMAR UDVA was 0.1 (approximately 20/25) or better in 57 eyes (95.00%). The mean overall efficacy index was 0.99 and the mean safety index, 1.02. Postoperatively, 1 eye (1.67%) lost lines (1 line) of CDVA. The postoperative spherical equivalent was within ± 0.50 diopter in 58 eyes (96.67%). There was a small, but statistically significant increase in the primary coma root mean square (0.17 μm) and in the magnitude of primary spherical aberration (0.09 μm). No severe complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Laser in situ keratomileusis using the solid-state laser provided predictable correction of low to moderate myopia, minimizing the induction of higher-order aberrations and preserving CDVA. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".