Thermodynamic of metal complexation of the macrocyclic antibiotic rifampicin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The acid-base and complexation equilibria of rifampicin with H + , Mn 2+ , Co 2+ , Ni 2+ , Cu 2+ , Zn 2+ , Cd 2+ , Hg 2+ , and Pb 2+ were studied by means of potentiometry. The stoichiometric equilibrium constants were determined in 50% (v/v) methanol-water medium at different temperatures and constant ionic strength (0.05 M KCl). It was established that rifampicin has two proton-binding sites. The distribution diagram of the corresponding ionic species as a function of pH is given and indicated that rifampicin exists predominantly in the zwitterionic form at pH [Formula: see text] 5. The thermodynamic parameters of protonation and complexation were derived and discussed. The formation of the complexes is spontaneous, more favourable at lower temperatures, entropically unfavourable, and an enthalpy-driven process. The order of the changes in Gibbs energy and enthalpy accompanying the complexation was found to be Mn 2+ < Co 2+ < Ni 2+ < Cu 2+ > Pb 2+ > Zn 2+ > Cd 2+ > Hg 2+ in accordance with the well-known sequence of Irving and Williams. The transition series contraction energy (E r (Mn-Zn)), and the ligand field stabilization energy (δH) were calculated from the enthalpy changes.Key words: rifampicin, thermodynamics, potentiometry, and complexation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".