Reactions of the (2-Pyridyl) Pyrrolide Platinum(II) Complex Driven by Sterically Encumbered Chelation: A Model for the Reversible Attack of Alcohol at the Coordinated Carbon Monoxide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Treatment of 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)-2-(2'-pyridyl)pyrrole (fpyroH) with Pt(DMSO)2Cl2 and Na2CO3 in THF solution gave a light-yellow complex denoted as [Pt(fpyro)2] (1). A single-crystal X-ray diffraction study on 1 revealed a large conformational distortion around the platinum(II) center, which is attributed to interligand repulsion between the pyridyl groups and the CF3 substituents of the nearby pyrrolides. Reaction of 1 with N- and C-donor ligands such as acetonitrile, pyridine, isocyanide, and CO affords the adducts [Pt(fpyro)2(L)], L = NCMe (2), pyridine (3), CNBut (4), and CO (5), showing formation of one monodentate fpyro ligand by release of the strain energy. The variable-temperature 1H NMR studies showed a static structure for the N-substituted adducts 2 and 3, whereas the C-adducts 4 and 5 are shown to be more labile, displaying a pairwise exchange of bidentate and monodentate fpyro ligands in solution. Addition of ethanol to the coordinated CO in 5 during recrystallization is also established, affording an ethoxycarbonyl complex [Pt(fpyro)(fpyroH)(CO2Et)] (6), which was isolated as a crystalline solid and can be readily converted back to 5 and free ethanol upon dissolution at room temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".