Cambrian successions of the Meguma Terrane, Nova Scotia, and Harlech Dome, North Wales: dispersed fragments of a peri-Gondwanan basin?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: The Meguma Terrane of Nova Scotia and the Harlech Dome of North Wales preserve similar sedimentary successions of Cambrian age. Both successions comprise a thick succession of early Cambrian sandstone turbidites, overlain by early to middle Cambrian alternating mud-rich and sand-rich units in which manganese is concentrated in two stratigraphic intervals. Above these, both successions comprise anoxic, organic-rich turbidites, shallowing upward into paler, more bioturbated Tremadocian mudstone with Rhabdinopora . Within the limited constraints of the available biostratigraphic and geochronological data, major changes in environment occurred synchronously in the two successions. Both successions show much greater similarity to each other than to adjacent successions on ‘Avalonia'. A detrital zircon analysis from the Rhinog Formation, low in the Harlech Dome succession, reveals distinct clusters of ages around 537 Ma and 2.0–2.1 Ga. A close similarity to analyses from the Meguma Terrane suggests proximity between the two terranes on the margin of Gondwana during the Cambrian Period. We suggest the term Megumia for the palaeogeographical domain that included the two successions, which was dispersed during subsequent Appalachian and Caledonian movements. These observations suggest that Megumia may have separated terranes previously regarded as parts of Avalonia. Supplementary material: U/Pb detrital zircon analytical data are available at http://www.geolsoc.org.uk/SUP18431 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".