MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024096703 · doi:10.1021/jp101275j

First-Principles Study of Ethylene on Ge(001)—Electronic Structures and STM Images

2010· article· en· W2024096703 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoli Fan, Cheng Qu, Qiong Chi, Ye Zhang, Woon‐Ming Lau

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDensity functional theoryEthyleneScanning tunneling microscopeAdsorptionChemistryAtomic orbitalElectronic structureSurface reconstructionMaterials scienceMolecular physicsCrystallographyComputational chemistrySurface (topology)NanotechnologyPhysicsGeometryPhysical chemistryQuantum mechanicsElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By using the first-principles density functional theory, we calculate the partial charge densities and STM images for the intradimer di-σ and interdimer end-bridge adsorption configurations of ethylene on Ge(001). Our simulated STM images show the effects of ethylene adsorption and clarify that, although STM images and surface structures evolve as the adsorption sites of ethylene on Ge(001), the molecular orbitals of the bare Ge atoms always remain the dominating electronic states near the Fermi level. For the di-σ model, the display of such dominance in STM images is, however, damped by the preferred tunneling paths between the tip and the electronic states of ethylene due to their short tunneling distances. In comparison, the distance between the tip and the end-bridge bound C 2 H 4 molecules is not so short relative to the distance between the tip and the up-Ge atoms of the bare Ge−Ge dimer; hence, the dominance of bare up-Ge atoms can still be found in the STM images at low bias voltages. Our simulated STM results confirm that the di-σ and paired-end-bridge configurations are observable adsorption structures for C 2 H 4 on Ge(001). The comparisons of the STM images between Ge(001) and Si(001) reveal the distinction of their highest occupied surface states, which explains the differences in geometry and reactivity of adsorbates, including C 2 H 4 and O 2, on Ge(001) versus Si(001).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207