MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract C225: Differential regulation of simultaneous antitumor and alloreactive CD8+ T cell responses in the same host by rapamycin.

2011· article· en· W2024119342 on OpenAlexaff
Saman Maleki Vareki, Martha J. Harding, Jason Waithman, Damien Zanker, Adil Shivji, Mateusz Rytelewski, Delfina M. Mazzuca, Maryam Atef Yekta, Weisan Chen, Todd D. Schell, S. M. Mansour Haeryfar

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCAR-T cell therapy research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEpitopeImmunogenicityVacciniaBiologyCD8T cellCytotoxic T cellImmune systemCancerAdjuvantVirusAntigenImmunologyCancer researchVirologyIn vitroRecombinant DNAGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rapamycin is an immunosuppressive agent routinely used in organ transplantation, but also paradoxically, exerts antiviral and anti-tumor activities. Pathogen-specific memory CD8+ T cell (TCD8) responses were recently found to be augmented by rapamycin. However, whether rapamycin influences the magnitude and quality of anticancer TCD8 responses is unknown. Importantly, how rapamycin may regulate simultaneous virus/tumor-specific and alloreactive TCD8 in the same host remains unexplored. To answer these questions, we primed wild-type mice with allogeneic cells concomitantly expressing simian virus 40 large tumor antigen (T Ag), a viral oncoprotein with well-defined epitopes. Rapamycin selectively improved the cross-priming of TCD8 specific for T Ag's most immunodominant epitope called site IV. Rapamycin-treated mice also had a high percentage of splenic CD127highKLRG1low TCD8 as well as an increased frequency of site IV-specific T cells long after the peak of their primary response. When site IV was presented as a cytosolic minigene encoded by a recombinant vaccinia virus, rapamycin failed to enhance the site IV-specific response. Therefore, the nature and presentation mode of antigen determine the susceptibility to the adjuvant effect of rapamycin. Our findings reveal the unexpected benefit of rapamycin treatment in recipients of allografts co-expressing tumor/viral Ags. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2011 Nov 12-16; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2011;10(11 Suppl):Abstract nr C225.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.060
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicCAR-T cell therapy researchFrench-language works237,207