Competing Autonomy Claims and the Changing Grammar of Global Politics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article argues that contending ideas about autonomy lie behind current discourses of human rights, claims to nation-state and cultural autonomy, and democracy promotion. Globalizing processes are bringing these contested understandings of autonomy, and their often silent framing within assumptions about sovereignty, into a new prominence. Locating itself within agonistic views of autonomy and politics, the article argues that it is necessary to pay closer attention to the perspectives that feminist and postcolonial analyses bring to understanding how autonomy, community, culture, and nation are co-constructed within imaginaries, such as liberal multiculturalism, that are no longer adequate to current demands for justice. To succeed, this renewed attention needs to locate itself within an effort to rethink academic community and the research protocols and collaborative practices this community permits and legitimizes. Este artículo sostiene que las ideas contendientes sobre la autonomía yacen detrás de las disertaciones actuales sobre los derechos humanos, las declaraciones de nación-estado y autonomía cultural y la promoción de la democracia. Los procesos de globalización están conduciendo estos entendimientos contradictorios de autonomía y sus encuadramientos generalmente silenciosos, dentro de las suposiciones sobre la soberanía, a un nuevo nivel de importancia. Este artículo que se ubica a sí mismo bajo una perspectiva ardua de autonomía y política, argumenta que es necesario poner mayor atención a las perspectivas que traen los análisis feministas y postcoloniales para entender cómo la autonomía, la comunidad, la cultura y la nación se han co-construído de manera imaginaria, tales como el multiculturalismo liberal que ya no son adecuadas para las demandas actuales de justicia. Para lograr el éxito, esta atención renovada debe situarse dentro de un esfuerzo para replantear a la comunidad académica, los protocolos de investigación y las prácticas colaborativas que esta comunidad permite y legaliza.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it