MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024134467 · doi:10.1159/000188676

Prediction of Reduction in Predialysis Concentrations due to Interdialysis Weight Gain

2008· article· en· W2024134467 on OpenAlexaff
Norman R.C. Campbell, L. Purchase, L. Longerich, M.H. Gault

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journals · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDialysis and Renal Disease Management
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemoglobinHemodialysisDialysisCholesterolInternal medicineEndocrinologyMedicineBilirubinWeight gainUltrafiltration (renal)Weight lossHematocritAlbuminLipoproteinDry weightAnimal scienceChemistryBiochemistryBody weightObesityBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is little quantitative information about the influence of weight change before and during hemodialysis on the concentration of proteins, lipoproteins, lipids, enzymes and other dialysis-resistant compounds in blood. We studied the concentration of 12 such compounds before and at the end of high-flux hemodialyses, 1.5 h after the start and 1, 2 and 3 h postdialysis and have developed formulae for roughly predicting the near steady-state 2-3 h postdialysis concentration. For hemoglobin, albumin, total protein and total cholesterol, the relationship of mean change in concentration to weight loss in groups was linear, and the % increase in concentration correlation correlated with % weight reduction (r = 0.64-0.81 and p = 0.002-0.0002). Correlations with ultrafiltration rate were comparable. By 3 h postdialysis values were relatively stable; the average fall in concentration for theses 4 compounds was 25% from end dialysis. The simplest formula we found which roughly predicts the % increase in concentration from predialysis to 3 h postdialysis is to multiply the % loss in body weight in kg during dialysis by 3.3. More accurate formulae were developed using combined and specific regression equations relating % weight loss during dialysis to % concentration rise. Mean values for alkaline phosphatase, triglycerides, lipoprotein (a), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, calcium, apolipoprotein B, bilirubin and aspartate aminotransferase also rose appreciably during dialysis with significant increases for the first five. With major interdialytic weight gain, the reduction in predialysis concentrations of hemoglobin and cholesterol may be enough to inappropriately modify treatment decisions about anemia (e.g. erythropoietin) or hypercholesterolemia, and to cause false concern about the concentration of albumin for nutrition and prognosis. Major weight gain may also contribute to concentration changes in numerous other compounds resistant to dialysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journalsSame topicDialysis and Renal Disease ManagementFrench-language works237,207