MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Review of the Hair Follicle Origin Hypothesis for Basal Cell Carcinoma

2009· review· en· W2024150672 on OpenAlexaff
Jeff Donovan

Bibliographic record

VenueDermatologic Surgery · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHedgehog Signaling Pathway Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPatchedBasal cell carcinomaHair follicleNevoid basal-cell carcinoma syndromeSignal transductionBiologyPTCH1Cancer researchBasal Cell Nevus SyndromeHedgehog signaling pathwayCell biologyInternal medicineMedicineBasal cell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of skin cancer treated by the dermatologic surgeon. The discovery that patients with the nevoid BCC syndrome had mutations in the human homologue of the Drosophila patched gene led to a rapid increase in our understanding of the pathogenesis of BCC. It is theorized that altered regulation at multiple steps in the patched signal transduction pathway may contribute to the development of BCC. This pathway also plays an essential role in embryonic hair follicle development and during the hair cycle. Taken together, a considerable body of evidence suggests that at least some BCC may be derived from deregulated patched signaling in hair follicle stem cells. OBJECTIVE: To review evidence of a follicular derivation of BCC and to highlight emerging therapeutic strategies to block deregulated patched signaling in BCC. CONCLUSION: Deregulation of the patched signal transduction pathway is present in the vast majority of human BCCs. Pharmacologic inhibitors of this pathway may offer a therapeutic strategy to block tumor growth. The author has indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.097
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations52
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDermatologic SurgerySame topicHedgehog Signaling Pathway StudiesFrench-language works237,207