MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024195238 · doi:10.1016/s0840-4704(10)60032-4

Research Meets Reality: <i>Administrative Data to Guide Planning for Canadian Regional Health Authorities</i>

2002· article· en· W2024195238 on OpenAlexaffabout
Janice D. Roberts, Randy Fransoo, Charlyn Black, Leslíe L. Roos, Patricia J. Martens

Bibliographic record

VenueHealthcare Management Forum · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicPrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Canadian institutionsManitoba Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHealth servicesHealth carePopulationBusinessHealthcare serviceService (business)Regional planningStrategic planningProcess (computing)Public administrationEconomic growthPolitical scienceMedicineEnvironmental healthUrban planningComputer scienceMarketingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The use of population-based information systems can help regional health authorities provide integrated healthcare. Administrative data from 1995 through 1997 for Manitoba's rural South Eastman Regional Health Authority and for the rest of Manitoba were used to aid South Eastman's strategic planning process. Three areas of concern were highlighted: the relatively high risk of poor health among residents of the RHA's Southern District, physician maldistribution and inconsistent patterns of service utilization. By improving population access to primary healthcare, regional imbalances are being addressed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.075
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.161
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score0.458

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0750.161
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0140.029
Science and technology studies0.0080.004
Scholarly communication0.0140.008
Open science0.0060.007
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.660
GPT teacher head0.596
Teacher spread0.064 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHealthcare Management ForumSame topicPrimary Care and Health OutcomesFrench-language works237,207