MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024199412 · doi:10.1080/00028487.2013.847861

Coastwide Stock Structure of Winter Flounder Using Nuclear DNA Analyses

2014· article· en· W2024199412 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Isaac Wirgin, Lorraine Maceda, Cheryl Grunwald, Nirmal Kumar Roy, John R. Waldman

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the American Fisheries Society · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNew York Sea Grant, State University of New YorkNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
KeywordsWinter flounderEstuaryFisheryFlounderStock (firearms)BiologyCapeGenetic structureGeographyEcologyGenetic variationFish <Actinopterygii>Archaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Many Winter Flounder Pseudopleuronectes americanus populations have declined dramatically. In U.S. waters, Winter Flounder are managed as three stocks: Gulf of Maine, southern New England–Mid‐Atlantic Bight, and Georges Bank. Historically, it was believed that the spawning of inshore stocks occurs exclusively within natal estuaries. Based on the supposition of estuary‐specific spawning, we hypothesized that Winter Flounder exhibit greater stock structure than predicted by the three‐stock model and, in fact, that they exhibit genetic differentiation at the level of individual estuaries. We tested this hypothesis by conducting microsatellite DNA analysis at 12 loci and single‐nucleotide polymorphism analysis at 4 loci on young‐of‐the year and adult Winter Flounder collected from 27 estuaries from Newfoundland to Delaware as well as from Georges Bank. We found highly significant coastwide genetic stock structure among Winter Flounder; however, there was little evidence of estuary‐specific structure. Pooled collections from north and south of Cape Cod were genetically distinct, as were many individual collections compared between these two regions. However, there was little genetic heterogeneity among estuarine collections within either of these major geographic regions. The two Canadian collections from the Miramichi River and Newfoundland were genetically distinct from those in the Gulf of Maine. Our collection from Georges Bank was marginally distinct from the inshore collections from north and south of Cape Cod. Overall, our genetic results support the three‐stock model used to manage Winter Flounder in U.S. waters and indicate the presence of at least two genetic stocks in Canadian waters (the Miramichi River in the Gulf of St. Lawrence and Passamaquoddy Bay in the Bay of Fundy). Furthermore, our data suggest that the spawning of Winter Flounder in nearshore coastal waters is more extensive than previously thought or that homing is weaker, contributing to the absence of genetic differentiation among populations from proximal estuaries.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the American Fisheries SocietySame topicFish Ecology and Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207