A general empirical formula of current–voltage characteristics for point-to-plane geometry corona discharges
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With a point-to-plane geometry, the experimental investigation of the current–voltage characteristics in corona discharges demonstrated that existing empirical formulae met with some physical difficulties in explaining the results. By mathematically processing the experimental data and applying the updated knowledge of corona inception, a new general formula in characterizing the relationship of corona current–voltage was derived and expressed as I = K(V − V0)n. It was demonstrated that the exponent n falls into a limited scope of 1.5–2.0, and there always exists an optimal exponent n in the scope, which can be determined by maximizing the R-square of regression. Of all the potentially influential factors, it was disclosed that the point radius has the strongest influence on the optimal exponent n, and the effects of ambient conditions and corona polarities are not noticeable. The optimal exponent n holds a fixed value of 2.0 for microscopic points and of 1.5 for large points with a radius in millimetres, but changes decreasingly with the radius for the points of microns. For given experimental conditions, the optimal exponent n almost does not change with the inter-electrode distance. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that the formula is applicable not only for both negative and positive coronas in point-to-plane geometries but also for both polarities in point-to-ring geometries. With the optimal exponent n, the formula can well explain the inconsistencies met by other existing formulae and best represent the characteristics of corona current–voltage with an accuracy of 1 µm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it