Incorporating DFIG based wind power generation in microgrid frequency regulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although wind power as a renewable energy is assumed to be an advantageous source of energy, its intermittent nature causes some conflicts especially in islanding mode of operation. While, it is economical to compensate wind with a conventional synchronous generator, the slow behavior of such a system may result in some stability concerns. Here, virtual inertia method, which imitates the kinetic inertia of synchronous generator, is used to improve the dynamic behavior of the system. In order to prevent any additional cost of inverter or energy storage device, the proposed control is implemented in the grid side converter of the back-to-back inverter connected to the DFIG rotor. The rotor side converter of this inverter is used to extract the maximum available power of wind. The concept and the proposed control method are discussed in details. Several case studies are used to show that this control algorithm can improve the dynamic performance of systems in case of disturbances such as islanding. By letting dispatchable DGs choose lower droop coefficients, the steady-state behavior of the system can be improved indirectly, while the virtual inertia just provides the power for short term. This improvement is shown in the work while the proposed method is implemented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".