MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024326937 · doi:10.1093/ehr/cep107

Mothers of Heroes, Mothers of Martyrs: World War I and the Politics of Grief

2009· article· en· W2024326937 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Hörne

Bibliographic record

VenueThe English Historical Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParallelsPoliticsTheme (computing)SacrificeJudaismGriefHistoryReligious studiesArgument (complex analysis)NarrativeIslamChristianityLiteratureGender studiesSociologyAncient historyArtPhilosophyLawPolitical scienceArchaeologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High on Vimy Ridge stands the figure of a hooded mother in mourning, sculpted by Walter Allward as part of his winning design for the national memorial to the 67,000 Canadian dead of the Great War. Behind the ‘Spirit of Canada’, as she is known, rise twin art deco columns at the base of which a falling soldier incarnates the ‘spirit of sacrifice’ as he passes the flame to his comrades. The monument, which Suzanne Evans discusses in her last chapter, sums up the theme of her cultural essay on the relationship between motherhood and martyrdom. At once Canadian and universal, the book moves sometimes uneasily between the two dimensions, plotting the role that mothers both assumed and were assigned in the process of coming to terms with the mass death of young Canadians in a distant land, while seeking parallels with mothers of other martyrs in other settings—from early Judaism, Christianity and Islam to Sikhism, the IRA in the 1980s and the Palestinian Intifadas. The result is stimulating and full of insight but ultimately unsatisfactory. The other examples are dealt with too summarily to develop the general argument, the more so since they are restricted to mythic and religious narratives rather than to the lived dilemmas of real women (except in the fleeting Irish and Palestinian references).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.455
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe English Historical ReviewSame topicIrish and British StudiesFrench-language works237,207