MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024333242 · doi:10.1117/12.742315

Femtosecond laser inscribed high temperature fiber Bragg grating sensors

2007· article· en· W2024333242 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen J. Mihailov, Dan Grobnic, Robert B. Walker, Huimin Ding, F. Bilodeau, Christopher W. Smelser

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFiber Bragg gratingFemtosecondMaterials scienceInscribed figurePHOSFOSFiber laserOptoelectronicsOpticsLaserOptical fiberFiber optic sensorPolarization-maintaining optical fiberPhysicsWavelength

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Silica-based fiber Bragg gratings (FBG) sensors are versatile devices that are typically fabricated using UV laser exposure. Their applicability is restricted to temperatures < 600°C because of the erasure of the UV generated grating structure at higher temperature. FBGs made with femtosecond IR lasers and phase masks in standard single mode fiber can have high long-term thermal stability at 1000 °C. Above 1000 °C however, the silica undergoes structural transformations that limit the functionality of the fiber. The most successful optical fiber used for high temperature sensor applications is the single crystal sapphire fiber, which has a glass transition temperature of 2030 °C. Here we present our work on retro-reflective FBGs fabricated in single mode silica and multimode sapphire fiber. For sapphire fiber Bragg gratings (SFBG), no degradation of the grating strength at high temperature was observed when tested up to 1500 °C. The SFBGs have discrete resonant wavelengths that could be used potentially as distributed optical sensor arrays up to 2000 °C. To produce a single mode response, the multimode SFBGs were probed using tapered single mode fibers producing single and low order mode reflection/transmission responses. The taper coupling improved the spectral resolution of the sapphire FBG as compared to its multimode responses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsFrench-language works237,207