MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024349211 · doi:10.1109/lpt.2013.2293505

Tunable Optoelectronic Oscillator Incorporating a Single Passband Microwave Photonic Filter

2014· article· en· W2024349211 on OpenAlexaff
Jiejun Zhang, Liang Gao, Jianping Yao

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Photonics Technology Letters · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Photonic Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassbandPhase noiseMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsOptical Carrier transmission ratesOpticsMicrowaveBroadbandOptical filterSIGNAL (programming language)Band-pass filterOptical fiberPhysicsTelecommunicationsRadio over fiberComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A wideband and continuously tunable optoelectronic oscillator (OEO) incorporating a single passband microwave photonic filter (MPF) is proposed and experimentally demonstrated. The single passband MPF is implemented using a broadband light source, a Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) in which a phase modulator is incorporated in one arm, a dispersion compensating fiber (DCF), and a photodetector (PD). The light wave from the broadband light source is sent to the MZI, and the output signal from the MZI is sent to the DCF and then detected at the PD. The overall operation is equivalent to a single passband MPF with the central frequency of the passband tunable by tuning the length difference between the two arms of the MZI. By incorporating the MPF into an OEO, a microwave signal with a tunable frequency is generated. The proposed OEO is experimentally evaluated. A microwave signal with a tunable frequency from 1 to 12 GHz and a tuning step of 0.5 GHz is generated. The phase noise performance of the generated microwave signal is evaluated. At 6.02 GHz, the phase noise is measured to be -107 dBc/Hz at an offset of 10 kHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Photonics Technology LettersSame topicAdvanced Photonic Communication SystemsFrench-language works237,207