Synthesis, Characteristics and Physico-chemical Study of Some Dichloro Pyrazoles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Some new 3,5-Diaryl-1-substituted pyrazoles have been synthesized by the action of isonicotinic acid and thio-semicarbazide on 3-iodo flavanones in pyridine medium. 3-iodo flavanones obtained from 2-hydroxy-3,5-dichloro chalcones and ICl in acetic acid. Structure of these compounds has been established by chemical and spectral analysis (NMR & IR). Purity of these heterocycles was checked by TLC. The interaction of Cu(II), Co(II) with 1-carboxamido-3-(2-hydroxy-3,5-dichloro pheyl)-5-(4-methoxy phenyl) pyrazole (L1), 1-thiocarbaxomedo-3(2-hydroxy-3,5-dichloro pheyl)-5-(4-methoxy phenyl) pyrazole (L2) have been carried out by employing Bjerrum -Calvin pH metric titration technique, at 27oC in 70 % dioxane-water medium. The data obtained can be used for the determination of proton ligand formation numbers (n). From the formation curve, the proton-ligand stability constant pK values have been evaluated using half integral method. The metal ligand formation numbers (n) are estimated by using Irving Rossotti’s expression.Metal-Ligand stability constants for 1:1 complex & 1:2 complex have been calculated which are designated by letters log K1 & log K2 respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".