Transient storage processes in a steep headwater stream
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This study examined hyporheic exchange flow and transient storage processes within a steep headwater stream, using both hydrometric and tracer approaches. Vertical hydraulic gradients varied systematically with location within step‐pool units, with upwelling located in a relatively narrow zone immediately below the step. Downward hydraulic gradients were greatest immediately above channel steps, and in that zone, gradients were also correlated with step height. Hydraulic conductivity tended to be lower in downwelling zones than in upwelling and neutral locations. Transient storage areas determined from reach‐scale tracer tests tended to increase with discharge, whereas transient exchange coefficients were not correlated with discharge. Transient storage exchange fluxes estimated from the reach‐scale tracer tests were an order of magnitude greater than hyporheic exchange fluxes estimated by scaling up local estimates based on Darcy's Law and piezometer measurements. This difference could be explained by the presence of lateral hyporheic flow paths and/or the influences of transient storage in pools. Tracer injections into infiltrometers using Rhodamine WT and sodium chloride allowed visual determination of hyporheic discharge zones and calculation of residence times for hyporheic flow through the step (pool inflow) and transport through the downstream pool (pool outflow). These tests indicated that residence time in pools can be comparable to hyporheic residence times, although the lack of replication in time and space limits the drawing of strong inferences. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".