MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024471601 · doi:10.4161/cc.10.10.15641

The dual-specificity phosphatase hYVH1 (DUSP12) is a novel modulator of cellular DNA content

2011· article· en· W2024471601 on OpenAlexafffund
Anna Kozarova, John W. Hudson, Panayiotis O. Vacratsis

Bibliographic record

VenueCell Cycle · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA modifications and cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyRibosome biogenesisPhosphataseDual-specificity phosphataseCell biologyCell cyclePopulationGene silencingPhosphorylationCellBiochemistryRibosomeRNAGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The dual-specificity phosphatase hYVH1 (DUSP12) is an evolutionary conserved phosphatase that also contains a unique zinc-binding domain. Recent evidence suggests that this enzyme plays a role in cell survival and ribosome biogenesis. Here, we report that hYVH1 expression also affects cell cycle progression. Overexpression of hYVH1 caused a significant increase in polyploidy and in the G 2/M cell population, with a subsequent decrease in the G 0/G 1 population. Phosphatase activity is dispensable, while the zinc-binding domain is necessary and sufficient for hYVH1-mediated cell cycle changes. In agreement with this, siRNA-mediated silencing of hYVH1 expression resulted in a dramatic increase in the G 0/G 1 population and susceptibility to cellular senescence. Additionally, mass spectrometry-based methods identified novel hYVH1 phosphorylation sites, including a C-terminal modification at position Ser ( 335) in the zinc-binding domain. Interestingly, phosphorylation at Ser335 regulates subcellular targeting of hYVH1 and augments the hYVH1 G 2/M phenotype. Collectively we demonstrate that hYVH1 is a novel modulator of cell cycle progression; a function mainly mediated by its C-terminal zinc-binding domain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCell CycleSame topicRNA modifications and cancerFrench-language works237,207