MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024558957 · doi:10.1001/archpedi.158.5.491

Osteopenia in Children Who Have Undergone Posterior Fossa or Craniospinal Irradiation for Brain Tumors

2004· article· en· W2024558957 on OpenAlexaff
Preetha Krishnamoorthy, Carolyn Freeman, Mark L. Bernstein, Sarah Lawrence, Celia Rodd

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicManagement of metastatic bone disease
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMedulloblastomaBone mineralOsteopeniaEpendymomaRadiation therapyNuclear medicinePosterior cranial fossaSurgeryOsteoporosisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: To determine lumbar spine and total body bone mineral density (BMD) in pediatric patients who have undergone cranial or craniospinal irradiation for posterior fossa tumors, specifically medulloblastoma and ependymoma and to analyze the association between degree of osteopenia and factors that may affect BMD. METHODS: Retrospective and prospective data collection included medical record review and examination, including pubertal, dietary, and activity assessment. Lumbar spine and total body BMD were measured by means of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Patients were routinely observed by the endocrinology department, and hormone deficiencies were corrected promptly. A subset of patients received calcium and vitamin D supplementation and underwent repeat BMD measurement 1 year later. RESULTS: Of 24 patients aged 4 to 20 years, 11 of whom were male, recruited from 1996 through 1999, 19 had medulloblastoma. All 19 underwent craniospinal radiotherapy plus a boost to the posterior fossa (mean +/- SD of 5410 +/- 130 rad [54.1 +/- 1.3 Gy] to the posterior fossa, mean +/- SD of 3470 +/- 460 rad [34.7 +/- 4.6 Gy] to the whole brain and spinal axis), and 8 of 19 underwent chemotherapy. The remaining 5 patients had ependymoma and underwent irradiation to the posterior fossa only (mean +/- SD of 5680 +/- 720 rad [56.8 +/- 7.2 Gy]). Therefore, there were 3 treatment groups: craniospinal irradiation and chemotherapy, only craniospinal irradiation, and only posterior fossa irradiation. Bone mineral studies were performed a mean +/- SD of 5.42 +/- 3.23 years after therapy. Our patients had lower total body BMD (mean z score, -0.47; 95% confidence interval, -0.85 to -0.09) and lumbar spine BMD (mean z score, -1.27; 95% confidence interval, -1.81 to -0.73) as compared with those of the the general population. There was no significant difference in mean lumbar spine BMD between patients in the 3 groups. Our patients consumed a diet deficient in vitamin D and calcium (mean +/- SD 53.6% +/- 24.1% and 70.0% +/- 37.4% of the amount recommended, respectively). Of 7 patients who underwent measurements 1 year later, 5 had in increase in BMD that was parallel to normal curves, with no compensatory increase. Four patients were hypothyroid, 6 were growth hormone deficient, and 6 were both. All hormones were replaced, with the exception of growth hormone in 1 patient. By using regression analysis, the factors that affected lumbar spine BMD, protectively in both cases, were calcium intake (beta = 0.015, 95% confidence interval, 0.001-0.029) and female sex (beta = 1.422, 95% confidence interval, 0.456-2.388). CONCLUSIONS: Children who have undergone irradiation for posterior fossa tumors have diminished total body and lumbar spine BMD, as compared with those of the general population. This reduction was similar within all 3 treatment groups, which suggests that chemotherapy did not play a major role and that localized irradiation may have systemic effects. This population often has balance and gait problems, so the risk of falling, coupled with osteopenia, may place them at considerably increased risk of fractures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.698

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives of Pediatrics and Adolescent MedicineSame topicManagement of metastatic bone diseaseFrench-language works237,207