MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024580589 · doi:10.1006/mthe.2002.0685

New Editor of Molecular Therapy

2002· article· en· W2024580589 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Inder M. Verma

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Therapy · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceEditorial boardEditor in chiefManagementComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Robert (Rob) Murray Frederickson has been appointed the Managing Editor of Molecular Therapy starting August 26, 2002. He will take over the responsibilities previously carried out by Fintan Steele. Rob obtained his Ph.D. in Biochemistry and Cell Biology in 1994 from McGill University in Montreal, Canada. He then joined Nature magazine as an assistant biology editor. From 1996 to 1998 Rob worked in the laboratory of Stan Fields at the University of Washington in Seattle as a postdoctoral fellow. In 1998 Rob rejoined the Nature group, first as Research Editor for Nature Biotechnology and then as Senior Editor at Nature Medicine. In November 2000, Rob was appointed the Editor and Director of Content Development of the biotechnology web portal Bio.com, based in Berkeley, California. He most recently was the Editorial Manager at LifeSpan Biosciences in Seattle. Rob is also a freelance writer for the Elsevier journal Chemistry and Biology. Rob is fluent in English and French and brings substantial experience in scientific publication. Rob will be based at Elsevier's offices in San Diego, California. The staff of Elsevier, the editorial board of Molecular Therapy, and the members of the American Society of Gene Therapy extend Rob Frederickson a very warm welcome! (Please continue to submit manuscripts to the New York office.)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.903

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular TherapySame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207