MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024606186 · doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.1185

1470 PROGRESSION TO MUSCLE INVASION DURING SURVEILLANCE OF UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA IS ASSOCIATED WITH POOR PROGNOSIS

2010· article· en· W2024606186 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rodney H. Breau, R. Jeffrey Karnes, Bradley C. Leibovich, Sarah Farmer, Christopher Morash, Ilias Cagiannos, Michael L. Blute, Igor Frank

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Urology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCystectomyMedicineBladder cancerCancerGeneral surgeryInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

You have accessJournal of UrologyBladder Cancer: Superficial II1 Apr 20101470 PROGRESSION TO MUSCLE INVASION DURING SURVEILLANCE OF UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA IS ASSOCIATED WITH POOR PROGNOSIS Rodney Breau, R. Jeffrey Karnes, Bradley Leibovich, Sarah Farmer, Chris Morash, Ilias Cagiannos, Michael Blute, and Igor Frank Rodney BreauRodney Breau Rochester, MN More articles by this author , R. Jeffrey KarnesR. Jeffrey Karnes Rochester, MN More articles by this author , Bradley LeibovichBradley Leibovich Rochester, MN More articles by this author , Sarah FarmerSarah Farmer Rochester, MN More articles by this author , Chris MorashChris Morash Ottawa, Canada More articles by this author , Ilias CagiannosIlias Cagiannos Ottawa, Canada More articles by this author , Michael BluteMichael Blute Rochester, MN More articles by this author , and Igor FrankIgor Frank Rochester, MN More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.02.1185AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Despite aggressive surveillance and timely cystectomy, many patients who initially present with non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC) eventually experience metastatic progression. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes of patients who present with non-muscle invasive UC and progress to muscle invasion prior to cystectomy. METHODS 981 consecutive cystectomy patients without a history of radiation or systemic chemotherapy were reviewed. Of these, 500 had non-muscle invasive disease at initial presentation. Group 1 (n=310) had cystectomy prior to muscle invasion, Group 2 (n=190) had cystectomy when they progressed to muscle invasion and Group 3 (n=481) had muscle invasion at initial presentation. RESULTS For groups 1 to 3, 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 85.4%, 52.9% and 62.4% (p<0.001); and 5-year overall survival rates were 70.0%, 42.1% and 49.5% (p<0.001). Of the patients who initially presented with non-muscle invasive disease, progression to muscle invasion was associated with increased risk of cancer specific death (Adjusted HR 2.38; 95% CI 1.6, 3.5). In addition, patients who progressed to muscle invasion on surveillance had worse outcomes compared to patients who initially presented with muscle invasion (overall survival HR 1.3; 95%CI 1.0, 1.5). CONCLUSIONS Despite close surveillance, many patients who progress to muscle invasion will die from UC. Patients who progress to muscle invasion on surveillance seem to have particularly aggressive disease and may benefit from neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy. © 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 183Issue 4SApril 2010Page: e566-e567 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2010 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Metrics Author Information Rodney Breau Rochester, MN More articles by this author R. Jeffrey Karnes Rochester, MN More articles by this author Bradley Leibovich Rochester, MN More articles by this author Sarah Farmer Rochester, MN More articles by this author Chris Morash Ottawa, Canada More articles by this author Ilias Cagiannos Ottawa, Canada More articles by this author Michael Blute Rochester, MN More articles by this author Igor Frank Rochester, MN More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of UrologySame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207