MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024677058 · doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2012.04.012

The Effect of a Prehabilitation Exercise Program on Quadriceps Strength for Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study

2012· article· en· W2024677058 on OpenAlex
Carly McKay, Harry Prapavessis, Timothy J. Doherty

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenuePM&R · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTotal Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreUniversity of CalgaryWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePrehabilitationWOMACPhysical therapyIsometric exerciseRandomized controlled trialOsteoarthritisTimed Up and Go testArthroplastyRehabilitationQuality of life (healthcare)Minimal clinically important differenceBody mass indexPhysical medicine and rehabilitationSurgeryInternal medicineBalance (ability)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a 6-week prehabilitation exercise training program on presurgical quadriceps strength for patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). DESIGN: Two-arm, parallel, randomized, controlled pilot trial. SETTING: Private exercise space in a research facility. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two patients scheduled for primary TKA. METHODS: Participants completed a series of baseline questionnaires (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC], Short Form 36, and Arthritis Self-efficacy Scale) and functional testing (isometric quadriceps strength assessment, flat-surface walk test, and stair ascent-descent test). The participants were randomized to a lower-body strength training program or to a nonspecific upper-body strength training program. The participants exercised 3 times per week for 6 weeks before TKA. Postintervention assessment occurred immediately before TKA, with follow-up assessments at 6 and 12 weeks after surgery. OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was isometric quadriceps strength. Secondary outcomes were mobility, pain, self-reported function, health-related quality of life, and arthritis self-efficacy. RESULTS: There was no significant treatment condition-by-time effect on quadriceps strength, but the effect size was large (F(3,18) = 0.89, P = .47, η(2) = 0.13). Similar findings were shown for walking speed (F(3,18) = 1.47, P = .26, η(2) = 0.20). There was a significant treatment-by-time effect for the Short Form 36 mental component score (F(3,18) = 0.41, P = .02, η(2) = 0.41), with differences emerging before surgery but not at either postoperative assessment. For all other secondary outcome measures, the treatment-by-time effect was nonsignificant and small. CONCLUSION: The intervention elicited clinically meaningful increases in quadriceps strength, walking speed, and mental health immediately before TKA. It did not impart lasting benefits to patients in the 12 weeks after surgery. Analysis of the results suggests that quadriceps strength may not drive functional improvements after surgery. These findings need to be replicated in larger trials before clinical recommendations are made about including strength training prehabilitation in everyday practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.972

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it