Lactic acid assisted wet fractionation of field pea (<i>Pisum sativum</i> L.) flour
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The use of lactic acid (LA) in the isolation of starch from field pea ( Pisum sativum L.) flour was investigated. The yield, purity, morphology, and the physicochemical properties (color, swelling, pasting and gelatinization characteristics, X‐ray diffraction pattern, and crystallinity) of the starches isolated with and without LA were determined. When compared to the control (0% LA), addition of LA at concentrations ranged from 0.5 to 7.0% v/v significantly increased the purity of the isolated starches up to 4% w/w and reduced the residual protein content by 6% w/w. The resistant starch and apparent amylose contents of the isolated starches using LA were significantly higher (up to 25 and 42.5%, w/w, respectively). Furthermore, the starches produced by LA assisted extraction showed significantly lower swelling factor and pasting viscosities, but generally insignificant changes were observed in the gelatinization parameters as compared to that of control. Marginal differences were observed in the X‐ray diffractograms between control and the LA processed starches. However, the relative crystallinity of LA processed starches was significantly higher than the control. The present study revealed that the use of LA in pea starch extraction show benefits in terms of starch purity, brightness, resistance to amylolysis, and apparent amylose content.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".