An Adaptive Contextual SEM Algorithm for Urban Land Cover Mapping Using Multitemporal High-Resolution Polarimetric SAR Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a semi-supervised Stochastic Expectation-Maximization (SEM) algorithm for detailed urban land cover mapping using multitemporal high-resolution polarimetric SAR (PolSAR) data. By applying an adaptive Markov Random Field (MRF) with the spatially variant Finite Mixture Model (SVFMM), spatial-temporal contextual information could be effectively explored to improve the mapping accuracy with homogenous results and preserved shape details. Further, a learning control scheme was proposed to ensure a robust semi-supervised mapping process thus avoiding the undesired class merges. Four-date RADARSAT-2 polarimetric SAR data over the Greater Toronto Area were used to evaluate the proposed method. Common PolSAR distribution models such as Wishart, G0p, Kp and KummerU were compared through this contextual SEM algorithm for detailed urban land cover mapping. Comparisons with Support Vector Machine (SVM) were also conducted to assess the potential of our parametric approach. The results show that the Kp, G0p and KummerU models could generate better urban land cover mapping results than the Wishart model and SVM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".