The Role of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Inguinal Wound Healing in Vascular Surgery Patients
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective was to determine whether incision application of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) will decrease postoperative wound complications in vascular surgery patients. A prospective, randomized trial randomized 81 incisions in 51 patients who underwent femoral artery exposure for elective revascularization procedures or endovascular abdominal aneurysm repairs. Incidence of diabetes, chronic renal failure, prosthetic grafts, body mass index (BMI), and steroid use did not differ. Using the ASEPSIS wound classification system, we found no difference in incidence of wound infection. Wound complications occurred in 9 (23%) of 40 of PRP group and 9 (22%) of 41 of non-PRP. Severe wound complications developed in 5 (13%) PRP and 6 (5%) of non-PRP (P = NS). In multivariate analysis, there were no predictors for wound infection. Groin wound complications rates are common in this patient group. Platelet-rich plasma did not decrease the incidence of groin wound complications in our patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it