Retinal arteriolar diameter, blood velocity, and blood flow response to an isocapnic hyperoxic provocation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to simultaneously quantify the magnitude and response characteristics of retinal arteriolar diameter and blood velocity induced by an isocapnic hyperoxic provocation in a group of clinically normal subjects. The sample comprised 10 subjects (mean age, 25 yr; range, 21-40 yr). Subjects initially breathed air for 5-10 min, then breathed O(2) for 20 min, and then air for a final 10-min period via a sequential rebreathing circuit (Hi-Ox; Viasys) to maintain isocapnia. Retinal arteriolar diameter and blood velocity measurements were simultaneously acquired with a Canon laser blood flowmeter (CLBF-100). The response magnitude, time, and lag of diameter and velocity were calculated. In response to hyperoxic provocation, retinal diameter was reduced from control values of 111.6 (SD 13.1) to 99.8 (SD 10.6; P < 0.001) microm and recovered after withdrawal of hyperoxia. Retinal blood velocity and flow concomitantly declined from control values of 32.2 (SD 6.4) mm/s and 9.4 (SD 2.5) microl/min to 20.7 (SD 3.4) mm/s and 5.1 (SD 1.3) microl/min, respectively (P < 0.001 for both velocity and flow), and recovered after withdrawal of hyperoxia. The response times and response lags were not significantly different for each parameter between effect and recovery or between diameter and velocity. We conclude that arteriolar retinal vascular reactivity to hyperoxic provocation is rapid with a maximal vasoconstrictive effect occurring within a maximum of 4 min. Although there was a trend for diameter to respond before velocity to the isocapnic hyperoxic provocation, the response characteristics were not significantly different between diameter and velocity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".