MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024909112 · doi:10.2310/7070.2004.03118

An Umbrella as a Potential Foreign Body in the Oral Cavity of the Pediatric Population: Report of Two Cases

2004· article· en· W2024909112 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Ameen Z. Alherabi, Johnna MacCormick

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Otolaryngology · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicForeign Body Medical Cases
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOral cavityForeign bodyPopulationSurgeryGeneral surgeryDentistryEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Foreign bodies in the oropharynx of the pediatric population are a well-known subject within the medical field. This report deals with two cases of a very unusual foreign body: an umbrella. Case 1 A 5-year-old boy was brought to the emergency room at the Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO) with the handle of an umbrella protruding through his mouth. The child had fallen face first on the handle while at school. On physical examination, the child was quiet and calm. His vital signs were all stable with oxygen saturation 100% on room air. The umbrella was protruding through his mouth., with minimal bleeding around its handle (Figure 1). Plain film radiography was not helpful because the intraoral part was radiolucent. The patient was rushed to the operating room. Under intravenous sedation, the umbrella was manipulated out of the child's mouth, and then he was endotracheally intubated. A thorough examination under anesthesia and exploration of the oropharynx revealed a 4 cm laceration in the right floor of the mouth, sparing the submandibular duct. There were no other observed injuries. The laceration was repaired primarily. The patient was discharged home on the same day once oral intake was established and covered with oral antibiotics. No long-term sequelae resulted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.193
Threshold uncertainty score0.306

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of OtolaryngologySame topicForeign Body Medical CasesFrench-language works237,207