Intra-atrial communication and control of atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) release
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) release was studied in isolated perfused atria prepared from rats. When the vein-atrial junction (VAJ) was distended with an inflatable balloon, ANF release into the perfusate was greater in intact atria than in appendectomized atria. It was concluded that distention of the VAJ causes ANF release from the atrial appendage. A cascade experiment was then prepared whereby buffer from one isolated atrium perfused a second atrium. Although the VAJ of the first atrium could be distended by balloon, the atrial appendage was ligated so ANF was not secreted into the perfusate. The second atrium was intact, but no balloon was inserted. Despite the fact that there were no changes in intraluminal pressure, ANF secretion from the second atrium increased when the VAJ of the first atrium was distended. This response was blocked by the endothelin (ET) A receptor antagonist BQ-123. However, no distention-induced changes in ET-1 levels could be found in the perfusate from the first atrium. It is proposed that, in response to changes in distention of the VAJ, ANF is released remotely from the atrial appendage. The mediator does not appear to be ET-1 itself, but rather some factor that stimulates ET-1-induced ANF release within the tissue of the atrial appendage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".