MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2024930098 · doi:10.1159/000119279

Assessing the Topographic EEG Changes Associated with Aging and Acute/Long-Term Effects of Smoking

2008· article· en· W2024930098 on OpenAlexaff
Verner Knott, Anne Harr

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuropsychobiology · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeural dynamics and brain function
Canadian institutionsRoyal Ottawa Mental Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectroencephalographyMedicineYoung adultAudiologyNicotinePathologicalPsychologyInternal medicinePhysiologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As neuroelectric research into the smoking/nicotine habit has focused exclusively on young and middle-aged adults, this electroencephalographic (EEG) study was conducted to determine whether a long-term smoking history alters the aging brain and/or whether the aging brain demonstrates an altered sensitivity to acute smoking/nicotine. Forty healthy adults, 20 young, aged 18-39 years, and 20 elderly, aged 64-81 years, volunteered for participation. Half of the young and elderly were nonsmokers with no previous smoking history and the remaining half of the young and elderly were current smokers with average smoking histories of 9.3 and 52.0 years, respectively. Smokers attended the laboratory for two randomized test sessions during which multisite EEG recordings were collected pre and post sham and cigarette smoking. Nonsmokers attended the laboratory for one nonsmoking EEG recording session. Spectral power indices showed aging to be associated with significant reductions in absolute delta and theta power and increases in relative beta power and faster mean total band frequency. Aging effects varied with recording region but not with smoker versus nonsmoker status. Smokers did exhibit a faster mean beta frequency. Acute cigarette smoking decreased absolute delta power in young smokers and increased relative alpha 2, beta power and mean alpha frequency in both young and elderly smokers. Only the young smokers showed increase in mean theta and total frequency. The results are discussed in relation to cognition in normal and pathological aging.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.810
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuropsychobiologySame topicNeural dynamics and brain functionFrench-language works237,207