De l’identification du salarié au discours officiel à l’intention d’action : la mise en évidence de profils ambivalents combinant engagement et résistance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nous construisons sur le concept de fragmentation d’identification du salarié pour en explorer les conséquences en termes d’intention d’action à l’occasion de la diffusion par le management d’un nouveau discours officiel. Nous mettons l’accent sur des salariés ayant un rapport ambivalent ou neutre à l’engagement organisationnel, en développant trois idéaux-types reposant sur l’opposition des émotions du salarié, la fragmentation d’identification entre les trois niveaux d’identification ou encore l’opposition entre les dimensions cognitive et émotionnelle dans l’identification. Nous proposons ainsi une analyse qui dépasse les profils plus simples – i.e. sans ambivalence – proposés par la littérature actuelle. Il s’agit d’un apport important pour la compréhension de la liaison entre identification et intention action.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".